🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a prohibition on sending state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a latest court ruling.

Appeals Court Agrees to Reconsider Case

The federal appeals court ruled on this week that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an larger group of 11 judges. The court also overturned a previous ruling from a smaller judicial group that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest development in a long-running legal battle over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to deploy national guard forces in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in uncertainty since the end of September when the mobilization attempt was started in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while city and state officials maintain that municipal police have control of the circumstances.

Contrary to descriptions of Portland as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and organizing activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in the city issued two legal injunctions this period – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the use of any military personnel in the state, after attempts to evade the initial injunction by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of state troops – but the second ruling remained in place, preventing the actual deployment of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under review simultaneously – by a group of 11 judges.

“This ruling demonstrates that the truth matters and that the courts are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the armed forces into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, principles, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”